"One cannot go on creating massive disturbances in childbirth and breastfeeding without altering the sexual life and the capacity to love of society as a whole". Michel Odent
Showing posts with label English. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English. Show all posts

October 9, 2013

Birthlight in Greece - report Sally Lomas

Η Sally ήταν μαζί μας για λίγες μέρες τον Σεπτέμβριο για να διδάξει το δεύτερο σεμινάριο Baby Yoga στην Ελλάδα. Μαζί με τις νέες εκπαιδευόμενες, βρήκαμε ευκαιρία κάποιες από τις παλιές (2011) και σπεύσαμε να εμπνευστούμε ξανά από το πάθος της γι αυτό που κάνει και την αγάπη της για μαμάδες και μωρά. Την οργάνωση είχε αναλάβει η αγαπημένη Έλντα. Ήταν υπέροχα. Ευχαριστούμε Έλντα - ευχαριστούμε Sally!  


I was recently teaching in Athens and was delighted to discover a vibrant and growing Birthlight community. We have offered courses in Greece for a few years and many have been drawn to our teachings seeing the opportunity to change the experience of pregnancy and birth for women and their babies. Despite the difficult economic situation there are now many pregnancy and baby classes and an expanding Birthlight family. Anna Zorzou has pioneered pregnancy and postnatal for yoga teachers and Elda Lati and Winston have organised baby and toddler trainings.

My recent trip was for Baby Yoga part 2 and it was wonderful to see so many students gaining their Qualification and hearing about the success of their classes. Elda is an independent midwife with many years of experience and great knowledge. She is also a Birthlight teacher and uses the techniques within her practice. When I asked her what differences she saw when women had prepared with Birthlight, she sat thoughtfully and then said “ I see less suffering and more enjoyment”. I opened our recent conference with her words as I feel this represents our Birthlight principles and supports our aim “For the greater enjoyment of pregnancy, birth and babies.” This photo is of Elda holding up her beautiful embroidered banner made with love over many years.

Hello to all teachers, parents and babies in Greece. I miss you Sally

October 4, 2013

Wait! Don't wash that newborn!


Ομολογώ ότι και στις δύο γέννες μου δεν με απασχόλησε ποτέ το θέμα του εμβρυϊκού σμήγματος και είχα σχεδόν μηδαμινή ενημέρωση για τα οφέλη του για το μωρό. Μάλλον από διαίσθηση - ή ίσως από την επιθυμία μου να μην τα αποχωριστώ λεπτό - δεν έκανα σε κανένα μπάνιο (εξάλλου δεν υπήρχε τίποτα να "καθαρίσω" και δεν ήθελα να χάσω με τίποτα αυτή την υπέροχη "μωρουδίλα"). Για άλλη μια φορά εντυπωσιάζομαι από το πόσο τίποτα δεν είναι τυχαίο στη φύση αλλά και - αντίστοιχα - το πόσο ο άνθρωπος επιμένει να το αγνοεί. Σημειώστε άλλο ένα θέμα για το οποίο χρειάζεται να ενημερωθείτε και - συνεπάγεται - να διεκδικήσετε... 


When I had my daughter, I made sure that the hospital staff did not give her a bath. I had done my research and learned that the vernix offers so many benefits and protection to a newborn, thus, why the baby is born covered in it to begin with. The vernix needs time to be absorbed into the baby’s skin; it is the best form of moisturizer that, unfortunately, money can’t buy! This combined with the fact that a newborn is not born dirty (contrary to popular belief) and the fact that he/she doesn’t need any type of chemical/additives that may be in what the hospital uses to bathe him/her are the reasons I wanted to wait and bathe my daughter at home. If you doubt my claim that babies are being washed with harsher soaps, please note that many hospitals use regular soap, and others use the wipes found through this link – I have not been able to find the ingredients to these, but, based on what I have found, they don’t look to be what I consider non-toxic by any means! Sage Cleansing Washcloths and one hospital’s take on bath wash: Parkland Memorial.

That being said, when I read Jennifer Azzariti’s article on Eco18.com about the importance of the vernix, I wanted to share it with you all. Both she and Eco18 graciously let me repost her article here! This is a shortened version. You can read her whole article on Eco18.com

WAIT! DON’T WASH THAT NEWBORN!

A Guest post by Jennifer Azzariti

Have you ever watched a television show where a baby is born and laughed as they hand the new mom a clean, approximately 8-week old baby? Most people are well-aware that babies are born with a slimy mucus-like covering on them. For years I just assumed it was from being inside of the mom’s uterus—leftover amniotic fluid or something that surrounded the baby while in utero. Well, this stuff has a name—vernix. And by definition, it’s “a white cheeselike protective material that covers the skin of a fetus.” But, what is it, and why do babies have it?

Vernix is produced during the third trimester and it provides a temporary skin barrier for the watery environment babies live in while in utero. According to Cosmetics & Toiletries Sciences Applied, the prenatal functions of vernix include:” waterproofing, since due to the low surface energy, vernix caseosa is highly unwettable; the facilitation of the skin formation in utero; and protection of the fetus from acute or sub-acute chorioamnionitis (an inflammation of the outer (chorion) and inner (amnion) fetal membranes due to a bacterial infection). During delivery, vernix caseosa acts as a lubricant while postnatally, it exhibits antioxidant, skin cleansing, temperature-regulating and antibacterial properties.”

Proven to have such great benefits postnatally, it makes you wonder why we are in such a rush to give newborns their first bath—removing the vernix.

Modern science and Western Medicine recognizes the benefits of vernix. A study regarding the significance of vernix was published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 191 (6), 2090-2096, titled: Antimocrobial Properties of Amniotic Fluid and Vernix Caseosa are Similar to Those Found in Breast Milk. This study revealed that a number of immune substances were present in both amniotic fluid and vernix samples. Tests using antimicrobial growth inhibition essays show these substances are effective at deterring  the growth of common perinatal pathogens— group B. Streptococcus, K. pneumoniae, L. monocytogenes, C. albicans and E. coli.

Results from this study brought into question the practices commonly used when treating newborns. The study suggests that baby’s first bath should be delayed until at least twenty-four hours after birth. The Department of Health in conjunction with the World Health Association has set-forth a protocol for newborns, and in the section regarding thorough immediate drying of the baby (0-3 minutes after birth), it says “Do not wipe off vernix,” and “Do not bathe the newborn.”  The protocol later states that you should wait at least six hours to wash the baby.

When you have a baby, it’s important to discuss your wishes with not only your physician, but also your entire care staff at the hospital where you deliver your baby. Make sure your partner is aware of your wishes, because if you’re like I was, you will be so caught up in pushing out a baby and the excitement that goes along with it, that postponing the first bath could easily slip your mind. If I were to have another child, I would inquire as to what the hospital’s protocol is. Whatever you do, make sure your wishes are known by everyone who will come into contact with your little one.

So, the next time you have a baby, let the hospital staff know you’d like to “Keep the vernix now, clean the baby later!”

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE WONDERS OF THE VERNIX, READ DAWN’S NOTES FOUND AFTER ‘ABOUT THE AUTHOR.’

About the author: A once working mother of two young children, Jennifer had an ah-ha moment and put her professional career on hold shortly before the birth of her daughter.  Shifting her focus to being a stay-at-home mom, Jennifer’s communication and research talents could not be suppressed. She has been successfully transforming her family’s lifestyle into a greener one and helping other moms take “green baby steps” too. Raised in Central New York, Jennifer now calls Long Island her home, but still holds true to many of the ideals instilled upon her growing up in a more rural area. You can contact her at jferris38@hotmail.com.

A side note from Dawn: When posting this I wanted to do a bit more digging and stumbled across this – a conversation of sorts between nurses questioning when the first bath should be given. I was surprised to see that baths are sometimes given at certain times based on the baby’s condition. For instance, if their temperature is of a certain range, they get a bath sooner than later. If not, they wait on the bath because of the danger it may pose to the baby. Not once in these conversations did I see mention of the importance of the vernix or the fact that it acts as a temperature regulator. From talking with nurses, it seems they aren’t taught about the vernix in school (at least the ones I have had conversations with)! This information made me think – another reason to delay the first bath! (I personally believe that a bath should not happen until the baby is at least a week old. The body needs its natural oils and a newborn’s skin is so delicate!) Timing of Newborn Bath

April 17, 2013

What your Doula wants you to know..



This Spring marks the 14th year that I have been serving families as a doula. In attending many births and in networking with other doulas during these years, it seems there are a few things that every doula would like for her clients to know. So parents, if you are using a doula for your birth or are considering hiring a doula, here are some thoughts to keep in mind.

Keep me in the loop. You have hired me to attend your birth, and I’m really looking forward to that. It’s important that you know that a big part of the support that I am able to offer you begins long before labor does. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to me. I’m here to be your “walking birth wiki”. I’m way less scary than Dr. Google, and I love to talk about birthy stuff. Pick my brain. Ask me questions. I will offer you information, share my resources, give you encouragement, and lend an empathetic ear to your concerns.   I especially want to know if you go to the hospital for any reason, or have something happening that you are worried about. It’s good for me to know what’s on your mind as you prepare for your baby, because this might come into play with your birth experience. Keep me posted about what’s going on with your prenatal care. Even if it’s just a note that says “Hi, we’re all great!”, I want to hear from you. It’s never “bothering me” to call. No apologies or guilt necessary. I’m going to let you set the pace for our communication; call me once a day, or call me once in pregnancy – that’s up to you. Everybody’s needs are different. I’m going to trust that you know that I’m here, and that you are reaching out as much as you need to.

Understand my role. You are the boss of this birth, and you have hired me as your doula.  This means that I don’t get to tell you what to do. You tell me what’s right for you. As an experienced doula, I might have relationships with your doctor, midwife, nurses, or hospital. With any luck, they are goodrelationships, and our being on a birth team together is something that will enhance your experience.  Providing non-medical labor support is my role on the team. I will do all I can to help you give birth the way you want to, while respecting the medical professionals and the rules of the birthplace you have chosen.  I am not there as a bodyguard or a bouncer. I don’t arrive prepared for combat.  I cannot throw myself between a woman and the doctor who is about to break her water. If I tried that, they would throw me out and never let me or any other doula come back. I want to support your birth, and I also want to be able to show up for the next mama who plans to birth there. So, I won’t speak to your doctor on your behalf. I don’t get to tell them what you will do. You certainly may, though. What I will do is remind you of your goals. I encourage you to ask questions that help you gather information, so that you have clarity to make your own decisions. I stand behind you in exercising your right to use your own voice to speak up about what you will accept or refuse.

Set yourself up for success. If you really want to have a low-intervention unmedicated waterbirth that’s “as close to a homebirth as possible”, then the big teaching hospital with a 95% epidural rate and no tub is probably not the best place for you. Chances are pretty good that if you choose to give birth there, the birth you want isn’t going to happen. Make sure that your birthplace and your birth attendant are a good fit for what you have in mind. You, as the consumer, have a choice. Look into the facilities that are available to you. Ask what options they provide, and find out what they offer to support you in creating the kind of birth you want to have. The same is true for choosing your doctor or midwife. The one who says, “Ugh, I don’t like doulas” isn’t very likely to be into the idea of other requests you make, either. Take personal responsibility for learning the rules of your attendant and your birthplace. Though I, as doula, may wish the highest and best for you, my being present will not protect you from factors that come with the territory of the location or practitioner you have chosen.

Prepare yourself for your birth. It is up to you to take charge of readying yourself as fully as you can for birth in body, mind, and spirit. Participate in good classes, educate yourself about birth options and coping skills, and take excellent care of your body and your mental and emotional health. Seek out the support that you need to do this. Your power is already your own, whether you choose to claim it or not.  It  is not mine or anyone else’s to give to you or to take away from you. I do not empower your birth. I do not advocate for you.  I support you in learning to empower and advocate for yourself. Likewise, I know a lot about having a baby, but I am not having your baby. I can make suggestions for positioning or comfort measures, and help you remember all of the ways that you have learned to cope with the intensity of labor. I can encourage you to ask for what you want. I cannot guarantee you that your birth will be easy or uncomplicated. Labor is hard work, whether you have a doula or not.  Birth is unpredictable, even when you’re well-prepared. When all is said and done, you are the one responsible for your choices. You are the one who will go through this process to become your child’s mother. Prepare yourself to surrender and release, and let your mind, your heart, and your body be open.

You have my unconditional support. This is your birth, not mine. My priority is to see that you know what your options are, and that you are informed in making your own best choice. I want to understand your hopes, fears, and goals for this birth, so that you feel seen and heard. When I ask about these things, I want your deeply honest answer. Please don’t concern yourself about the “right” answer, or what you think I want to hear.  I will offer comfort in whatever way I can to help your experience happen in the way that you hope for. I will remind you of the wishes you have shared with me, and give you encouraging words and hands-on support if you want to have a drug-free birth. I believe in you, and I know you can do this. I will not leave you if you change your mind and decide that pain medication is the right option for you. I will not judge you for the choices that you make. This is your body, your baby, and your birth. I trust you to make the best decisions for yourself. If something happens differently than what you had hoped or planned for, please don’t apologize to me. You have my support when you are scared. You have my support when you think you can’t do it anymore. You have my support when you are crying. You have my support when you are angry, or irreverent, or unglued, or unlovely. You have my support in your joy.  This is your birth. I’m here for you.

Our relationship will change. I love being your doula. I love the whirlwind courtship of getting to know you well in a short time. I love hearing your stories about your life,  the births of your children before this one, the story of how you met your beloved, the story of your own birth as your mother told it to you. I ask intimate questions that perhaps you hadn’t even thought about before, about your hopes and fears, and how you cope with overwhelm, and what makes you feel safe. More than anything, I listen. Toward the end of your pregnancy, we may be talking once a week. In the last few days, we might be checking in every day.  I might not ever know the names of your siblings, or where you grew up, or any of the other things your friends would usually know, but by the time your baby is born, we have forged a bond that is close, and real, and beautiful. Then, after your baby is here and you are settled in as a new mother, I don’t see you much anymore, and we hardly ever talk.  Please don’t take it personally. Know that I still care very much, even if I probably won’t make it to your child’s birthday party. Our relationship as doula and mama happens for a finite period of time. I miss you. I still love you. I cherish the memory of the time I have shared with you, and now I’m offering that same support to my next mama. I’m just as busy with her as I was with you. This is what doulas do.

I will always be grateful. Thank you for allowing me to serve as your doula. I would say thank you every day, if I could. Thank you for inviting me into your life, your home, your birth space.  Thank you for trusting me to witness the birth of your child. Thank you for the honor and the privilege of caring for you through this part of your life. Every birth touches my heart. Every birth brings a lesson, and I am grateful for the learning that comes from your birth. I am grateful for this place where our paths crossed, and our life stories are woven together for this short while.  Thank you always, and blessings on the journey.


August 11, 2012

Milo's birth story (February 2012)

Yet another inspiring story coming from the Invisible Midwives



Our first son’s birth had been a good one, all things considered; in a birth centre, 14 hours of active labour, a rather long pushing stage (3 and a half hours) due to his hand being up by his ear, but all without intervention and resulting in the birth of a big, beautiful boy who we instantly fell in love with.

When I became pregnant again 18 months later, my first instinct was to go back to the same birth centre for this labour. Most of my friends seem to have had a pretty shocking time giving birth in hospital, and I considered myself lucky to have had a positive experience. I can’t say I enjoyed Rory’s birth exactly, but no-one enjoys childbirth, I thought, and simply to have gotten through it without drugs or injury to myself or my baby was as good as it was going to get, surely? But as the months went on and I became more confident that this little baby was sticking around, I begun to reconsider and question some of the things that had happened during Rory’s birth. The car journey, for starters – Hell. Then the painful vaginal examination upon arrival. I had been amazed to discover during a stretch and sweep 24 hours previously, when I was experiencing no labour pains at all, that I was already 3 cm dilated. How wonderful! This was going to be easy, surely. But when I arrived at the birth centre having been in labour for 6 hours, getting 3 contractions every 10 minutes and in a lot of pain, a VE revealed that I was… 3 cm dilated. Still 3 cm? How is this even possible?! At this rate I was going precisely nowhere. 

I was also told that the baby was slightly posterior and the cervix was quite far back. The message was clear: you’re going to be here a long time. In fact, let’s send you home. Please no! I begged. I can’t have another contraction in a car! The birth centre was quiet that evening, so eventually they gave in and let me stay. But a shadow was cast over the rest of the first stage. ‘You’re going nowhere, fast’ hung around in the back of my mind and I couldn’t shake it off. The contractions intensified, the pain was worse than I could have imagined, and it seemed to have no end. If only someone could tell me how much longer, was all I could think. I need to know that this will end. I need the certainty of an end point. But of course no-one can tell you when that will be. 

Then the second stage, at last! Instantly the pain was manageable. I could do this. The end was in sight. But three hours later I was starting to doubt myself. Could I really do this? It was such hard work, it seemed impossible. Everyone was telling me to push, push, push. I had been ready to breathe my baby out, but now I was pushing so hard, working harder than I had ever worked in my life. I was sweating and straining and shaking with the effort of each exhausting contraction. I was the one suggesting Ventouse! But thankfully I lucked out with a midwife who defied the 2 hour time limit and told me that I was going to get this baby out, and no-one else. And, eventually, I did. The sense of achievement was overwhelming.

Given the intensity of that experience, perhaps the obvious choice second time around would have been to opt for an epidural. Many people do and I have absolutely no argument with that choice. I get it, I really do. But I suspected, deep down, that a better option was available. I looked into home birth, and by the time of my booking appointment my mind was made up. With Rory’s birth I couldn’t wait to get to the hospital, as it seemed to be the place of safety. I was in pain, I was (I now realise) scared, and I wanted someone or something to rescue me. Having heard many friends’ birth stories since then, I now understood that the hospital was far from the safest place to be if your idea of safety is to avoid major abdominal surgery. Or head trauma to your baby, or damage to your pelvic floor. All of these things are more likely if you choose to give birth in a hospital. I could go back to the birth centre, sure, but I learned that they were short-staffed and that many people were being turned away. And although it’s nicer than the hospital labour ward, it still involves a car journey and the risk of exposing my baby and me to hospital bugs (it’s in the same building as the hospital). I wanted to be at home. 

Unfortunately though, my local hospital was reluctant to ‘allow’ me to have a home birth. One positive Group B Strep test half way through the last pregnancy meant that fluorescent yellow stickers were all over my notes: “Warning: Group B Strep”. I was ‘high risk’, despite subsequent tests finding no trace of infection, and despite all tests coming back negative during my current pregnancy. I read around the subject of Group B Strep extensively, and came to the conclusion that I didn’t want antibiotics during labour this time. These intravenous antibiotics had been cited as the reason for denying me a home birth, and yet even though I was going to refuse them, they still told me I couldn’t birth at home. I knew, of course, that they didn’t have the right to refuse me a home birth – they have to send someone out to attend a birth, by law – but the whole point of going down this route was to be in a supportive and caring environment, and the impression I was being given was that my NHS carers would be jittery and fearful of the hospital protocol. Hardly the atmosphere I wanted around me for the birth. So I started to look into independent midwifery.

I met with five different independent midwives, but after meeting the first ones, Kemi Johnson and Laura La Roche, I knew that I’d found the women I wanted to be with me during my pregnancy and birth. They were so lovely, and everything about them exuded joy and excitement about birth. Here were two women seriously passionate about their jobs. They were eminently qualified too: their knowledge and training exceeded that of typical NHS midwives. I quizzed them on obstetric emergencies and I knew that I was in safe hands. They weren’t assessing me purely as a series of risks to be managed, and they didn’t have to be scared of hospital protocol; instead they listened to me and saw me as a healthy woman enjoying a healthy pregnancy. I knew that they would give my baby the safest and gentlest welcome into the world.

Getting to know Kemi and Laura throughout my pregnancy was a pleasure. The appointments often lasted 2 hours or more and I got the opportunity to pick their brains about all sorts of things related to birth. During one of these lengthy chats I asked what they would do if the cord was round the baby’s neck. They gave me a detailed answer, including how management of this had changed in recent years. I wasn’t to know then that this would prove relevant to my baby’s birth. 

I woke up a week before my due date after a good night’s sleep. Rory woke up and came into our bed for a cuddle, then the supermarket delivery arrived; the fridge was soon overflowing with the huge number of buy-one-get-one-free offers I had been inexplicably drawn to this week. Over breakfast Chris and I talked about how we were going to get the baby clothes down from the loft over the next few days. We also had to road-test filling up the birth pool, and of course I had my hospital bag to pack, just in case. Rory had been 10 days late so naturally we assumed that we had ages to get these things done. And I didn’t feel nearly uncomfortable enough yet to think that labour was imminent.

Chris went off to work and Rory and I got ready to go out to meet a friend at a playgroup. Nearly out the door, then a toddler tantrum starts – Rory does NOT want to walk there, he wants to take the car. I explained that this wasn’t possible, the church where the playgroup takes place is really close and there’s nowhere to park there – we’d end up parking outside our house again. This line of argument doesn’t resonate with a determined 2 year old. We go round in circles, I try cajoling, I try being firm, I try bribery. None of it works. Then I notice that for a while now I’ve been getting vague period-pain type feelings. Nothing heavy, in fact I remember the same feelings for a good week before Rory’s birth. Could be early labour of course. I noted the comedy of the situation: I should be lying in a bath now, I thought, surrounded by candles and chanting. Not arguing with a 2 year old who’s refusing to put his shoes on. Eventually the friend who we’re meeting, Louiza, sends a photo of her son Dimitri playing with a fire engine at the playgroup and this does the trick – we’re off.

It was a beautiful day, cold, crisp and clear. Most of the snow from two days earlier had melted but a few snowmen still lined the route. On the way there I texted Kemi to let her know I’ve been getting very light contractions every 15 minutes or so, and called Chris at work. We got to the playgroup and Louiza, who could barely contain her excitement at being with me during what may or may not be early labour, downloaded an app onto my phone that keeps a log of the contractions. This proved to be a stroke of genius: all I had to do was press a button at the start and end of each contraction and my phone did all the rest. I carried on as normal throughout the morning, playing with Rory, having chats with other mums and nannies, just stopping every now and then to close my eyes and breathe through a contraction. When it finished at 12.30 Louiza suggested we go back to hers for a while, so we all got on the bus, a major treat for Rory and Dimitri. I love the photo I have of the two boys grinning, side by side on the bus – the last photo I have of my little boy before he became a big brother.

Back at Louiza’s she made me a delicious lunch, after which I walked Rory around in the buggy until he went to sleep. By this stage I could still walk through the contractions but there was no way I could talk. Dimitri didn’t manage a nap that day and sat quietly with us watching Dumbo. I will always associate that film with the increasing intensity of contractions and the feeling that this was really happening – the baby was going to be born today. My phone rang and out of the blue my oldest school friend, Tara, who home-birthed both of her children, is talking to me. We’re both amazed that she chose that moment to call, as we haven’t spoken to each other for several months. I can feel her love and support and it’s great. Then I lay down in Louiza’s spare room and closed my eyes for a rest, continuing to push the button on my phone at the beginning and end of each contraction. After an hour or so of this I looked at the log: every four minutes lasting 40-50 seconds! I called Kemi to let her know, and she told me, very calmly and politely, to get home. Now. And to call Chris and tell him to get home as soon as possible. She’d be there as soon as she could.

Suddenly I was in labour, for real. One word kept on coming into my mind: inescapability. You really can’t escape your body during labour. It’s the most ‘in’ your body you’ll ever be. Up to a certain point you can try to ignore the sensations, but at some point you have to face it head on and dive in. It’s just you, your baby and the present moment; nothing else exists while you’re in the peak of a contraction.

There was much excitement as Louiza and I bundled Rory and Dimitri into her car for the journey back to mine. Another car journey in labour! Just what I’d been trying to avoid. But thankfully it was short and before I knew it we were home. Chris was home already, Kemi was round the corner getting some fish and chips, and soon the house was bustling with everyone else: Laura, my sister Bella, and of course Louiza and Dimitri, who were doing a grand job of entertaining Rory. I went to our bedroom and leant over the bed, listening to Rory shriek with laughter as the boys squirted each other with water from his toy fire engine. It felt so exciting, a real party atmosphere. Chris massaged my back through the contractions, and in between them he ran around the house preparing Rory’s tea, making him laugh, getting the birth pool out and welcoming the new arrivals. During my first labour I had been totally focussed on contractions: how many, how often, how painful. At the end of a contraction all I could think about was how long I would have to wait before the next one started. This time around I became aware of the fact that most of your labour is spent NOT having contractions. Sure, the contractions hurt, but during the gaps in between you feel completely normal, and there’s nothing to keep you grounded in normality like having to find the toy police car with the flashing light before the next one starts. 

Chris set up the TENS machine and we laboured on with a mixture of TENS and massage. Kemi or Laura came upstairs occasionally to listen to the baby’s heartbeat – all was well. I was far less noisy than last time, making a low “zhhh” sound and swaying my hips. It came home to me once again how important the breath is. I found that if I was ‘wrong-footed’ by starting a contraction on an inhalation, the pain was noticeably worse and I felt out of control. If I timed it well with a long, deep in-breath before the contraction started, I had a full exhalation to work with. The feeling was like surfing  – catching the crest of a wave and rolling into shore. I also found that it was very easy to get “stuck” in one position, and that as the labour intensified it was important to change position frequently. Sometimes I felt like I had to pick myself up by the scruff of the neck in order to do this. Even though a position was beginning to be uncomfortable, it felt like some kind of powerful magnet was keeping me there. I understand why women get stuck in the lithotomy position, particularly if people are telling you to lie down. But moving from all fours to a squat, to hanging off Chris’s neck, to lying down on my side, to leaning against the wall, was really the lifesaver as the contractions intensified. Each change of position brought with it a new way to manage the pain, and a new opportunity for my baby to move down.

As we hadn’t expected to be having a baby for at least another week, one of the many things we hadn’t done was to check that the nozzle I’d bought for the hose to fill up the birth pool fitted onto the kitchen tap. Unfortunately it didn’t. I was listening to the discussions going on downstairs and remember looking at the clock – 17.25 – and thinking that they’d better hurry if they’re going to catch the hardware shop round the corner. Luckily they did and soon the birth pool was filling up. Louiza and Dimitri went home and my mum arrived to keep Rory entertained. 

I remember asking Laura how much longer she thought I had to go. Her answer was perfect: “I have no idea. But we’re not going anywhere, and your baby will come when it’s ready. You’re exactly where you need to be right now.” So true. At one point I became worried that the baby had turned and was posterior, as I was feeling back pain between the contractions. Kemi came upstairs to check me out. I was wearing a bra and trousers, so my back was visible. Much to my amazement she told me (without any internal examination) that the pain I was feeling was because my sacrum was moving, which meant that I was probably 7 or 8 cm dilated. Such good news! I hadn’t thought I was nearly that far along. And it acted as a catalyst – the power of the good news really sped things up. Kemi invited me downstairs to get into the birth pool. 

On the way down I stopped off in the bathroom to use the loo. Then I spent some time hanging off the towel radiator in a standing squat, which felt really good. I could feel the baby moving down with each contraction, it was incredible. It was as though Kemi telling me I was so far along in my labour had given me permission to really let go and let this baby come down. Chris and I went downstairs and everything looked so beautiful: furniture pushed to the side, fairy lights on, and a pool of lovely warm water waiting for me. I undressed and got straight in. Such a wonderful feeling – the pain relief was real and tangible. I got my favourite music paying and I was relaxed and happy. After about 10 minutes I started making ‘pushy’ sounds and my legs gave some involuntary twitches, which Kemi later told me wasn’t quite the 2nd stage starting, but was most probably my baby’s head dilating an anterior lip of cervix and nestling into the perfect position. Too often women have a vaginal examination at this point, which can then lead to many unnecessary interventions when they find that she is pushing before she ‘should’. If, instead, they waited a while, my midwives tell me that things invariably sort themselves out – the baby’s head flexes nicely and the cervix dilates fully.

A short while later I was pushing for real, a deeper, guttural sound. I was on my knees, leaning over the edge of the pool and hugging Chris. At one point I felt a pop and knew that my waters had broken. I laboured in this position for a while but there was no denying that it was all becoming quite hard work; the ghosts of the last labour began to rear their heads. Laura suggested – and what still amazes me is that this was the only time that either midwife suggested anything to me during labour, as the rest of the time they simply let me get on with it or said “you’re doing great, listen to your body” – that I try a different position. I moved around a bit and then found, much to my surprise, that I wanted to be lying back with my legs outstretched and my arms extended along the top of the pool. It was a position of total surrender, a bit like I was on a sun lounger, and it was perfect. 

Rory wanted to come down for a cuddle at one stage, and it was easy and natural to have him come downstairs and check in with us both. “What you doing mummy?” he asked. “The baby’s being born” I told him (he’d watched lots of birthing videos with me and knew the score). “Oh, okay. See you later!” he said before toddling back upstairs. The baby continued to move down with each contraction, and I felt that we wouldn’t have long to wait. I was pushing, but only because it felt totally right to do so. When I tried not pushing and just “breathing the baby down” I found the contractions to be painful. When I pushed it felt good, and I could feel the progress. At the moment of crowning I worried a little that I would tear, as I thought that maybe I was pushing too much – but then suddenly the head popped out! Such a relief. And then an incredible feeling as the baby turned and wriggled. I remember thinking “wow, babies really want to be born”. Then Laura calmly told me that the cord was round the neck and she was going to do the somersault manoeuvre. I was so pleased we’d had that discussion earlier, as I knew what she meant and felt totally calm. We waited, and then she skilfully and easily guided the baby out with the next contraction. Then came the magical words, “reach down and pick up your baby”. I scooped up a vernixy, slippery bundle and hugged it to my chest. We were so happy. The water was clear, if a little white from the vernix. No blood and, I deduced, no tearing. The second stage had lasted one hour, and he was born at 8.14pm.

It seemed like ages before anyone thought to say “what have you got?” and I lifted the bundle away from my chest – a boy! He had been quiet and calm up to that point, but when I took him away from my body he wailed a strong lusty cry, a pattern that continued for many weeks! He does like a cuddle. Chris went upstairs to get Rory and my mum, and they joined us round the pool, Rory saying “there’s a BABY in the paddling pool!” over and over. My mum was very surprised that he was born so quickly – she thought I was being far too quiet to be near the end of labour and was getting ready to camp down for the night. After a while I got out of the pool with the cord still attached, put a dressing gown on and sat on the sofa. We waited a good hour and a half before cutting the cord. Then we weighed him – a healthy 8 lb 5 oz. The placenta came out a little later. No clocks ticking, no deadline to get it out – all was well and the placenta came out whole and healthy.

We’d done it, a beautiful home water birth. After all those months of anticipation it had all been so straightforward, and so calm. And yes, I’d go so far as to say that, this time, I actually enjoyed childbirth. I realised afterwards that it hadn’t even occurred to me to think about pain relief. I had total faith throughout that everything was going to be fine – and that to me is the power of surrounding yourself with people who trust in the process of birth. It rubs off on you. 

Rory took it all very much in his stride and I was so pleased not to have had an enforced separation from him. 2 months on there’s no sign of jealousy, and I’m sure that’s in large part due to the fact that he was very much involved on the day his little brother was born, and mum was always available to him. He regularly plays at giving birth to his teddy bears and finds it very funny. It’s lovely that he sees it as a completely normal event. 

By midnight everything was clean and tidy, Kemi, Laura and my mum had gone home, and we were snuggled up in bed together. So civilised! I couldn’t sleep a wink as I was too excited, looking at my beautiful little boy. The two of us didn’t leave the house for 5 days. Physically I felt fine. Better than fine – I felt great. But all I wanted to do was rest, eat and cuddle my boys.

The first few weeks were happy but challenging as I found breastfeeding Milo difficult. Having had no problems feeding Rory, this time around it was painful and I had cracked nipples, and later mastitis too. Having Kemi and Laura at the end of the phone and popping in frequently was wonderful and an unexpected bonus of choosing independent midwives, and without their support it would have been much more of a struggle to get breastfeeding established. Now Milo’s a gloriously fat and happy baby and I feel so thankful that he’s had such a gentle start to life. It gave us the best possible start to life as a family of four. I emerged from his birth physically and emotionally stronger. It’s an experience I’ll treasure forever.


January 17, 2012

'Mother Robin' wins CNN Hero of the Year

By Kyle Almond, CNN, December 27, 2011

Los Angeles (CNN) - Robin Lim, an American woman who has helped thousands of poor Indonesian women have a healthy pregnancy and birth, was named the 2011 CNN Hero of the Year on Sunday night.

Through her Bumi Sehat health clinics, "Mother Robin," or "Ibu Robin" as she is called by the locals, offers free prenatal care, birthing services and medical aid in Indonesia, where many families cannot afford care.

"Every baby's first breath on Earth could be one of peace and love. Every mother should be healthy and strong. Every birth could be safe and loving. But our world is not there yet," Lim said during "CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute," which took place at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles and recognized Lim and the other top 10 CNN Heroes of 2011. 

Many women in the developing world do not have access to contraception or maternal care. According to the United Nations Population Fund, three out of five women giving birth in South Asia do so without a skilled birth attendant on hand.

In Indonesia, the average family earns the equivalent of $8 a day, according to the International Monetary Fund. But a baby delivery costs about $70 at a hospital, and a Caesarian section can cost as much as $700.

Lim believes Indonesia's high maternal and infant mortality rates are caused in part by these costs, which many women cannot meet.In Indonesia, the average family earns the equivalent of $8 a day, according to the International Monetary Fund. But a baby delivery costs about $70 at a hospital, and a Caesarian section can cost as much as $700.

"The situation is bad ... babies are unattended, deliveries have become commercialized, and mothers die from hemorrhage after childbirth because they can't afford proper care," Lim told CNN earlier this year.

The CNN Hero of the Year was chosen by the public after an 11-week vote on CNN.com. For being named Hero of the Year, Lim will receive $250,000 for her cause. That's in addition to the $50,000 that she and the rest of the top 10 Heroes each received for making the top 10.

This is the fifth year that CNN, with the help of entertainers and other celebrities, have honored everyday people changing the world. Among this year's presenters were comedians Jerry Seinfeld and George Lopez; actors J.R. Martinez and Chris Colfer; musical artists Ice Cube and will.i.am; model Christy Turlington Burns; former NFL quarterback Kurt Warner; and actresses Laura Dern, Mary-Louise Parker and Sofia Vergara. 

Kid Rock performed the song "Care" from his platinum-selling album "Born Free," while Miley Cyrus sang her triple-platinum hit "The Climb."

Turlington Burns introduced Lim's video tribute during Sunday's show, before the Hero of the Year announcement. As founder of Every Mother Counts, she is also a passionate advocate for maternal health around the world.

"Eight years ago, after giving birth to my first child, Grace, I felt what could have been a life-threatening complication," she told the audience of nearly 5,000. "It suddenly got very scary, very fast. If I hadn't received the expert care in the hospital birthing center I was in, then I may have not been so fortunate.

"My wish is that every mother all over the world has the same chance surviving childbirth I had. My friend Robin Lim shares that wish and she spends her days and nights making it so."


Turlington Burns recently made the trip to Indonesia to meet Lim and see her work firsthand.

Lim became a midwife after her sister -- and her sister's baby -- died from complications during pregnancy several years ago. She and her husband then sold their home in Hawaii and moved to Bali to "reinvent their lives," she said.

"It was there she learned she could make a difference," Turlington Burns said. "She opened a clinic, Bumi Sehat, so poor mothers can give birth safely and be treated with dignity and respect. She has delivered thousands of babies, and that is why they call her 'Ibu' -- Mother."

After being announced as the CNN Hero of the Year, a tearful Lim accepted the award from host Anderson Cooper and made an impassioned plea for help.

"Today on our Earth, 981 mothers in the prime of their life will die -- and tomorrow again and yesterday," she said. "And I'm asking you to help change that. We don't even know how many babies are lost, but all of us can help change that."


October 25, 2011

It' so exciting! It seems like we are setting up an ever growing community of passionate mothers who feel the need to advocate in favor of natural birth, breastfeeding and attachment parenting. Check out this beautiful blog by Sofia who says about herself: 

"... Birthing and mothering have completely altered my mindset and made me re-evaluate my values. Ever since I became a mother I made a promise to myself, to help as many other women like myself find this great path in life by supporting them through rocky times during pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and breastfeeding. And toddlerhood from then on… Supporting natural birth became a “raison d’être” for me. My two babies are free-spirited, independent, communicative, and very tender and I’m pretty certain it’s all because of my persistence and determination to enjoy my pregnancy, enjoy my birth to the fullest and enjoy attachment parenting from there on.... I consider myself an activist where it comes to mothering rights. I’m trying to spread the message and free women, like me, from the state of fear society has imposed on us be it hospital protocols to birth or well meaning relatives who patronize us with tons of “advice” when we first have a baby. I’d also love to discuss how motherhood has brought us up to higher spiritual levels, rendered us so much more empowered and dynamic and made us see the world around us differently."

Check out especially two of her most recent amazing posts:



 

July 7, 2011

"Home birth on the rise by a dramatic 20 percent" - AP article

With thanks to the anonymous commenter of my previous post, here's a most encouraging article by Associated Press journalist Leanne Italie (bold signing & links added by me):

NEW YORK (AP) — One mother chose home birth because it was cheaper than going to a hospital. Another gave birth at home because she has multiple sclerosis and feared unnecessary medical intervention. And some choose home births after cesarean sections with their first babies.

Whatever their motivation, all are among a striking trend: Home births increased 20 percent from 2004 to 2008, accounting for 28,357 of 4.2 million U.S. births, according to a study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released in May.

White women led the drive, with 1 in 98 having babies at home in 2008, compared to 1 in 357 black women and 1 in 500 Hispanic women.

Sherry Hopkins, a Las Vegas midwife, said the women whose home births she's attended include a pediatrician, an emergency room doctor and nurses. "We're definitely seeing well-educated and well-informed people who want to give birth at home," she said.

Robbie Davis-Floyd, a medical anthropologist at the University of Texas at Austin and researcher on global trends in childbirth, obstetrics and midwifery, said "at first, in the 1970s, it was largely a hippie, countercultural thing to give birth outside of the hospital. Over the years, as the formerly 'lay' midwives have become far more sophisticated, so has their clientele."

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which certifies OB-GYNs, warns that home births can be unsafe, especially if the mother has high-risk conditions, if a birth attendant is inadequately trained and if there's no nearby hospital in case of emergency. Some doctors also question whether a "feminist machoism" is at play in wanting to give birth at home.

But home birthers say they want to be free of drugs, fetal monitors, IVs and pressure to hurry their labor at the behest of doctors and hospitals. They prefer to labor in tubs of water or on hands and knees, walk around their living rooms or take comfort in their own beds, surrounded by loved ones as they listen to music or hypnosis recordings with the support of midwives and doulas. Some even go without midwives and rely on husbands or other non-professionals for support.

Julie Jacobs, 38, of Baltimore, who has multiple sclerosis, said she "chose midwives and hypnosis because I wanted to surround myself with people who would support me as a birthing mother, rather than view me as an MS patient who would be a liability in need of interventions at every turn." Her first two children were born in a freestanding birth center operated by midwives. After the center closed, her third child was born at home in 2007. "If I had been in a hospital I probably would have had C-sections for all three," she said. "With the first, I would have been terrified to try a home birth. After the second one I was like, hey, I can't necessarily walk in a straight line, but I can do this."

Some home birthers cite concerns over cesarean sections. The U.S. rate of C-sections in hospitals hovers around 32 percent, soaring up to 60 percent in some areas. In some cases, there's a "too posh to push" mentality of scheduled inductions for convenience sake (Victoria Beckham had three).

Gina Crosley-Corcoran, a Chicago blogger and pre-law student, had a C-section with her first baby and chronicled nightmarish pressure from nurses and doctors to abandon a vaginal birth with her second. She followed up with a third child born at home in April. "I do think there's a backlash against what's happening in hospitals," she said. "Women are finding that the hospital experience wasn't a good one."

In Portland, Ore., acupuncturist Becca Seitz gave birth to both her children at home, the first time in 2007 because she and her husband were without insurance. "It was never on my radar, until we couldn't afford otherwise," she said. "I'm granola, but not that granola. It cost us $3,300, as opposed to over $10,000 in a hospital." Her midwife was prepared with the drug Pitocin, oxygen and other medical equipment. "They were both born over the toilet," she said. "It was a nice position. It's a way that we're used to pushing."

Dr. Joel Evans, the rare board-certified OB-GYN who supports home birth, said the medical establishment has become "resistant to change, resistant to dialogue, resistant to flexibility."

"Women are now looking for alternatives where they can be treated as individuals, as opposed to being forced to comply with protocols, which however well meaning, have the impact of both medicalizing childbirth and increasing stress and anxiety around delivery," said Evans, founder and director of the Center for Women's Health in Stamford, Conn., and an assistant clinical professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York.

By some accounts, in 1900, 95 percent of U.S. births took place at home. That slipped to half by 1938 and less than 1 percent by 1955.

Today, most midwife-attended births take place in hospitals in the U.S., and many midwives are licensed nurses. But there are also close to 1,700 midwives who practice outside of hospitals, said Davis-Floyd. In 27 states, so-called "lay" midwives who lack nurses' training but are licensed and certified as professional midwives can attend births legally.

Some women chose home births after learning about it from TV shows or documentaries. The show-all "House of Babies" on Discovery Health Channel from 2005 to 2009 was filmed at a Miami birth center run by a midwife. Actress Ricki Lake screened her movie, "The Business of Being Born", around the United States in 2007 after giving birth at home to her second child. The film also showed Lake's filmmaking partner, Abby Epstein, documenting her own frantic taxi ride to a New York hospital after abandoning her home birth because the baby presented feet first, with the umbilical cord wrapped around his neck.

Michael Robertson, 27, of Poulsbo, Wash., knew nothing about home birth before watching the TLC series. "I just really had my mind set on a water birth, like on the show," she said. "It looked so cool, so relaxing." She had two babies at home, but opted for a planned hospital delivery for her third child due to complications. She's glad she had the choice. "If you don't know your options, you don't know what's out there to begin with," she said. "I don't think an OB will say to you, 'Hey, did you know there was this thing called home birth.'"

Most studies of home birth have been criticized as too small to accurately assess safety or distinguish between planned and unplanned deliveries, according to researchers Kenneth C. Johnson and Betty-Anne Daviss.

In 2005, they published a study in the British Medical Journal based on nearly 5,500 home births involving certified professional midwives in the United States and Canada. The study, considered one of the largest for home births, showed 88 percent had positive outcomes, while 12 percent of the women were transferred to hospitals, including 9 percent for preventive reasons and 3 percent for emergencies.

The study showed an infant mortality rate of 2 out of every 1,000 births, about the same as in hospitals at the time, Davis-Floyd said. "Women who are truly educated in evidence-based maternity care understand the safety and the multiple benefits of home birth," she said.

Leanne Italie can be reached at http://twitter.com/litalie

June 29, 2011

M. Odent: "The point is to rediscover the basic needs of women in labour"

...Why not offer a ceasarian section to all women? People have some intuitive knowledge that there is something wrong in this conclusion. They feel that the way we are born have longterm consequences, that we have to think in terms of civilization... we have to introduce new criteria to evaluate how we are born. These people often think that they don't need scientific data to transmit their intuitive knowledge, they think that they can just speak the language of the heart and that's enough... but nobody will listen... 

...They have to learn to combine what they can transmit with the language of the heart also with what we are learning today from a scientific perspective which are usually outside the field of medicine... There are several of them, but all participate in what I call the "scientification of love". Until recently, love was the topic of poets, philosophers, novelists. Today, love is studied by several scientific perspectives... Ethnologists were the first ones to tell us in particular that among all mammals, immediately after the birth of the baby, there is a short period of time, which will never happen again and which is critical in the mother-baby attachment... Since then so many other data from so many other perspectives have appeared. Probably the most spectacular ones at the present time, are the data provided by those who study the behavioral of hormones involving childbirth... like oxytocin. 



...What we are learning today is that oxytocin is not necessary just to contract the uterus for the birth of the baby and the delivery of the placenta... Oxytocin may be considered as the typical love hormone... So, in order to give birth mammals in general and women in particular, are supposed to release a complex cocktail of love hormones... When we know that it is the capacity to love which is involved in the way we are born, we have to learn to think in terms of civilization. We are really at a turning point in the history of childbirth, perhaps also in the history of mankind. 



...We can wonder why in our society and almost everywhere in the world, most women today cannot release the hormone they are supposed to release when giving birth. The reason is we have completely forgotten what the basic needs of a laboring woman are... That is because the birth process has been controlled by the cultural millieus for thousands of years. Also scientists have dramatically disturbed the birth process... The key when a woman is giving birth is to maintain her level of adrenalin as low as possible. When she releases a lot of adrenalin, she cannot release the hormone necessary for childbirth which is oxytocin...




...What we have to do today is to rediscover what is simple. An overview of what I learnt during the past 50 years or even more, is that the typical good environment for a good birth is when there is nobody around but an experienced, motherly, low-profile, silent midwife. That's what the main preocuppation of a midwife should be - to maintain the mother's level of  adrenalin as low as possible. We have to rediscover who was the midwife originally... She was a mother figure. And with our mother, in an ideal world, we feel secure - a basic need when giving birth - without feeling observed or judged - privacy, another basic need during childbirth.

...The important thing to realize is how societies have dramatically disturbed the birth process for thousands of years mostly with beliefs and rituals. I'll give you an example. If you transmit the belief that the colostrum is bad (this is what the baby can find in the breast immediately after birth). To modern science it is a precious substance, but most societies have claimed it is dangerous, which means that when the baby is born, she must not be in the arms of the mother but in the arms of somebody else. And for that you need a ritual, which is the widespread ritual of cutting the cord. This is a certain way to disturb what we call the third stage of labour, a time which is vital for the survival of the mother... a phase which is critical for the capacity to love. There are thousands of similar examples. The conclusion is that today, if we want to rediscover the basic needs of women in labour we cannot rely on any cultural model. That's why we need the perspective of physiology (the study of humanly functions) which is universal. 




...The point is not to reduce the rates of Ceasarian sections... that could lead to difficult vaginal births... with epidural, forceps etc. The point is to rediscover the basic needs of women in labor. And the rest will follow...